DATE

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

Lauren Jade Hill: How does your background in fine art define your approach to architecture?

Peter Marino: It has made me more sensitive to aspects like color, texture and the human visual perception of things, rather than what I may say is typical architecture. It’s a really different approach.

LJH: How has the design of Chanel stores evolved over the years?

PM: The brand designs to be modern and timeless, so in theory it shouldn’t ever outdate our boutiques. Having said that, we do pick some locations—look at the new one in Miami—that are going to be more modern and fun than one we might do in London or New York. Just as you aren’t going to sell winter coats in Miami, we aren’t going to have the same architecture everywhere we go.

Peter Marino in front of Y.Z. Kami’s A Portrait of Coco Chanel (1993).

LJH: What distinguishes the new Miami Design District outpost?

PM: It’s a big white cube with cubic windows and a huge volume inside—much larger in that sense than almost any other one I’ve done. It has an exhilarating staircase under a skylight, because the sun in Miami is something you really want to emphasize, and it is more striking in that we have only used black and white. We usually have a lot more color, but this building has a younger, edgier vibe.

LJH: What sets Chanel apart?

PM: It has a kind of modernity that never goes out of fashion—and you can’t say that about many other brands.

We’d Like to Come Home With You Tonight…

We’re getting ready to launch our first ever CULTURED at Home issue, packed with one-of-a-kind interiors. Pre-order your copy now and be the first to have it land at your abode.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We Have So Much More to Tell You!

This is a Critics' Table subscriber exclusive.

Join the Critics’ Table to keep reading and support independent art criticism.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.